Sunday, November 24, 2019

Prime Ministers of Canada Since 1867

Prime Ministers of Canada Since 1867 The prime minister of Canada heads the government of Canada and serves as the primary  minister of the sovereign, in this case, the monarch of the United Kingdom.  Sir  John A. Macdonald  was  the first prime minister since Canadian Confederation  and assumed office on July 1,  1867. Chronology of the Canadian Prime Ministers The following list chronicles the Canadian prime ministers and their dates in office since 1867. Prime Minister Dates in Office Justin Trudeau 2015 to Present Stephen Harper 2006 to 2015 Paul Martin 2003 to 2006 Jean Chretien 1993 to 2003 Kim Campbell 1993 Brian Mulroney 1984 to 1993 John Turner 1984 Pierre Trudeau 1980 to 1984 Joe Clark 1979 to 1980 Pierre Trudeau 1968 to 1979 Lester Pearson 1963 to 1968 John Diefenbaker 1957 to 1963 Louis St Laurent 1948 to 1957 William Lyon Mackenzie King 1935 to 1948 Richard B Bennett 1930 to 1935 William Lyon Mackenzie King 1926 to 1930 Arthur Meighen 1926 William Lyon Mackenzie King 1921 to 1926 Arthur Meighen 1920 to 1921 Sir Robert Borden 1911 to 1920 Sir Wilfrid Laurier 1896 to 1911 Sir Charles Tupper 1896 Sir Mackenzie Bowell 1894 to 1896 Sir John Thompson 1892 to 1894 Sir John Abbott 1891 to 1892 Sir John A Macdonald 1878 to 1891 Alexander Mackenzie 1873 to 1878 Sir John A Macdonald 1867 to 1873 More About the Prime Minister Officially, the prime minister is appointed by the  governor general of Canada, but by constitutional convention, the prime minister must have the  confidence  of the elected  House of Commons. Normally, this is the leader of the party caucus with the greatest number of seats in the house. But, if that leader lacks the support  of the majority, the governor general can appoint another leader who has that support or may dissolve parliament and call a new election. By  constitutional convention, a prime minister holds a seat in parliament and, since the early 20th century, this has more specifically meant the House of Commons.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

CAMApplication and Caution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

CAMApplication and Caution - Essay Example eason why traditional care providers are reluctant in suggesting or implementing CAM techniques is because CAM techniques are not proven to be effective for the patient. Secondly these techniques are usually done by non-physicians who do not have knowledge about the treatment they are providing to the people. Different people claim that since these techniques are natural therefore they are not harmful. However different homeopathic drugs are known to cause side effects because of higher alcohol concentration and expiration date problem. It is said that these techniques help the patient in a mental or psychological sense (Gavura, 2011). The lack of promotion does confirm the gap in healing modalities, as when the health care institutes do not promote CAM techniques for the patient who are critical and do not have much chance for survival, then it is certain that the gap between the CAM techniques and healing modalities will increase. If the health care institutes start promoting techniques like acupuncture for the patients who do not show much positive response to the medical treatment and medicine, then they would at least have another chance or the hope for survival. If the patients are not even aware of the treatment options then they will not be aware of the different options they can utilize to in order save their lives or increase the quality of their lives. There are times when the CAM techniques have proved to be better than the other treatments. However the health care staff has not promoted the CAM techniques enough to let the patients know about the possible advantages associated with it. Lack of promotion of CAM techniques is the reason why these techniques are not being used as vastly as the other medical treatments, which is the reason behind the increased gap in healing modalities. There are several benefits associated with CAM techniques and the patients have the right to know about all the treatment options that are available to them, whether they